When trying to use puppet to update a package to a particular version and exec
a command when that update is applied, puppet calls yum which successfully updates the package, but puppet then thinks the update has failed and hence doesn't trigger the exec. Next cycle the package is already the correct version, so the update isn't applied, so the exec is never called.
manifest snippet:
package { "test":
ensure => "1.21",
}
exec { "testcmd":
command => "/foo/bar",
refreshonly => true,
subscribe => package["test"]
}
Output from puppetd:
debug: Puppet::Type::Package::Provider Yum?: Executing '/usr/bin/yum -d 0 -e 0 -y install test-1.21'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parameter.rb:279:in `fail'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/package.rb:88
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/package.rb:84:in `instance_eval'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/property.rb:181:in `instance_eval'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/property.rb:181:in `call_valuemethod'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/property.rb:350:in `set'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/property.rb:422:in `sync'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/propertychange.rb:81:in `go'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/propertychange.rb:109:in `forward'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transaction.rb:117:in `apply_changes'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transaction.rb:109:in `collect'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transaction.rb:109:in `apply_changes'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transaction.rb:81:in `apply'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transaction.rb:238:in `eval_resource'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transaction.rb:237:in `thinmark'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util.rb:444:in `measure'
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/benchmark.rb:342:in `realtime'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util.rb:444:in `thinmark'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transaction.rb:239:in `eval_resource'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transaction.rb:309:in `evaluate'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transaction.rb:308:in `thinmark'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util.rb:444:in `measure'
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/benchmark.rb:342:in `realtime'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util.rb:444:in `thinmark'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transaction.rb:310:in `evaluate'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transaction.rb:302:in `collect'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transaction.rb:302:in `evaluate'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/node/catalog.rb:118:in `apply'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/network/client/master.rb:264:in `run'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/network/client/master.rb:263:in `benchmark'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util.rb:211:in `measure'
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/benchmark.rb:342:in `realtime'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util.rb:211:in `benchmark'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/network/client/master.rb:263:in `run'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/network/client/master.rb:245:in `synchronize'
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/network/client/master.rb:245:in `run'
/usr/bin/puppetd:439
err: /:main/Node[testnode]/test/Package[test]/ensure: change from 1.20 to 1.21 failed:
Could not update: Failed to update to version1.21, got version 1.20 instead at
/etc/puppet/modules/test/manifests/init.pp:28
notice: /:main/Node[testnode]/test/Exec[testcmd]: Dependency package[test] has 1 failures
warning: /:main/Node[testnode]/test/Exec[testcmd]: Skipping because of failed dependencies
The package is successfully updated to 1.21. The yum command -
'/usr/bin/yum -d 0 -e 0 -y install test-1.21' - works fine with returncode
0 and no errors when run independently.
O/S is Scientific Linux 4 (RHEL4), yum version is 2.4.2.
Response from Luke on puppet-users:
"This is a result of the following code:
is = self.query
unless is
raise Puppet::Error, "Could not find package %s" % self.name
end
# FIXME: Should we raise an exception even if should == :latest
# and yum updated us to a version other than @param_hash[:ensure] ?
if should && should != is[:ensure]
raise Puppet::Error, "Failed to update to version
#{should}, got version #{is[:ensure]} instead"
end
I *think* that code is in place because yum always exits 0, so we need
to do extra checking to see if it actually installed or not.
It looks like the query isn't actually running again, which is your
problem.
Please file this as a bug; it should be relatively straightforward to
fix."